v1
- result
- ok
- prompt tokens
- 4,445
- output tokens
- 1,561
- cost
- $0.0314
- latency
- 44,796 ms · 3 calls
- at
- 2026-10-19 22:10
- stages
- intake extraction grounding appetite
- decision
- REFERRED
- fitScore
- 45
- retries
- 0
- fieldsWrong
- 0
| check | verdict |
|---|
| extraction_schema | pass |
| fields_correct | pass |
| construction_canonical | not applicable |
| nulls_stay_null | pass |
| decision_correct | pass |
| attribution_jev | pass |
| attribution_claude | fail |
{
"decision": "REFERRED",
"expectedDecision": "REFERRED",
"decisionCorrect": true,
"fitScore": 45,
"confidence": 0.6325,
"reasons": [
"aggregate confidence 63% below 70% threshold",
"missing required fields: state, unit count, TIV (total insured value)"
],
"extraction": {
"insuredName": {
"value": "Seabreeze Duplexes LLC",
"confidence": 0.95,
"source": "email"
},
"propertyAddress": {
"value": "118 Ocean View Dr; 122 Ocean View Dr",
"confidence": 0.75,
"source": "both"
},
"state": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"county": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"units": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0.2,
"source": "both"
},
"tiv": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"constructionType": {
"value": "Frame",
"confidence": 0.95,
"source": "both"
},
"yearBuilt": {
"value": 1988,
"confidence": 0.6,
"source": "both"
},
"targetPremium": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"subclass": {
"value": "Duplex/fourplex schedule",
"confidence": 0.85,
"source": "both"
},
"priorLossSummary": {
"value": "Insured states losses were minor cosmetic damage only; prior carrier non-renewed after storm season. No loss runs provided.",
"confidence": 0.5,
"source": "email"
}
},
"extracted": [
{
"field": "insuredName",
"value": "Seabreeze Duplexes LLC",
"source": "email"
},
{
"field": "propertyAddress",
"value": "118 Ocean View Dr; 122 Ocean View Dr",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "constructionType",
"value": "Frame",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "yearBuilt",
"value": 1988,
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "subclass",
"value": "Duplex/fourplex schedule",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "priorLossSummary",
"value": "Insured states losses were minor cosmetic damage only; prior carrier non-renewed after storm season. No loss runs provided.",
"source": "email"
}
],
"fields": [
{
"field": "state",
"expected": null,
"got": null,
"correct": true
},
{
"field": "tiv",
"expected": null,
"got": null,
"correct": true
}
],
"retries": 0,
"guardrails": [
{
"node": "extraction",
"guardrail": "schema",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"node": "grounding",
"guardrail": "grounding",
"status": "warn"
},
{
"node": "appetite",
"guardrail": "missing_fields",
"status": "warn"
},
{
"node": "appetite",
"guardrail": "confidence",
"status": "trip"
}
],
"flags": [
{
"field": "propertyAddress",
"issue": "ambiguous",
"detail": "address has no resolvable state or county — cannot place the risk"
},
{
"field": "yearBuilt",
"issue": "contradiction",
"detail": "Email says insured reports ~2005 while the county record and attachment show 1988; sources conflict, so 1988 is not uncontested."
},
{
"field": "subclass",
"issue": "ambiguous",
"detail": "not clearly supported by source: Sources describe duplex-style rentals; 'Duplex/fourplex schedule' is an inference, and the schedule's 4-unit locations are not described as fourplexes."
},
{
"field": "state",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "state is required by the appetite ruleset"
},
{
"field": "units",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "unit count is required by the appetite ruleset"
},
{
"field": "tiv",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "TIV (total insured value) is required by the appetite ruleset"
}
]
}v2
- result
- ok
- prompt tokens
- 4,939
- output tokens
- 1,957
- cost
- $0.0339
- latency
- 50,302 ms · 3 calls
- at
- 2026-10-19 22:10
- stages
- intake extraction grounding appetite
- decision
- REFERRED
- fitScore
- 42
- retries
- 0
- fieldsWrong
- 0
| check | verdict |
|---|
| extraction_schema | pass |
| fields_correct | pass |
| construction_canonical | not applicable |
| nulls_stay_null | pass |
| decision_correct | pass |
| attribution_jev | pass |
| attribution_claude | fail |
{
"decision": "REFERRED",
"expectedDecision": "REFERRED",
"decisionCorrect": true,
"fitScore": 42,
"confidence": 0.5459999999999999,
"reasons": [
"aggregate confidence 55% below 70% threshold",
"missing required fields: state, TIV (total insured value)"
],
"extraction": {
"insuredName": {
"value": "Seabreeze Duplexes LLC",
"confidence": 0.97,
"source": "email"
},
"propertyAddress": {
"value": "118 Ocean View Dr; 122 Ocean View Dr",
"confidence": 0.8,
"source": "both"
},
"state": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"county": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"units": {
"value": 8,
"confidence": 0.4,
"source": "attachment"
},
"tiv": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"constructionType": {
"value": "Frame",
"confidence": 0.95,
"source": "both"
},
"yearBuilt": {
"value": 1988,
"confidence": 0.7,
"source": "both"
},
"targetPremium": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"subclass": {
"value": "Duplex/fourplex schedule",
"confidence": 0.8,
"source": "both"
},
"priorLossSummary": {
"value": "Insured states losses were minor cosmetic damage only; prior carrier non-renewed after storm season. Not verified by loss runs.",
"confidence": 0.5,
"source": "email"
}
},
"extracted": [
{
"field": "insuredName",
"value": "Seabreeze Duplexes LLC",
"source": "email"
},
{
"field": "propertyAddress",
"value": "118 Ocean View Dr; 122 Ocean View Dr",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "units",
"value": 8,
"source": "attachment"
},
{
"field": "constructionType",
"value": "Frame",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "yearBuilt",
"value": 1988,
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "subclass",
"value": "Duplex/fourplex schedule",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "priorLossSummary",
"value": "Insured states losses were minor cosmetic damage only; prior carrier non-renewed after storm season. Not verified by loss runs.",
"source": "email"
}
],
"fields": [
{
"field": "state",
"expected": null,
"got": null,
"correct": true
},
{
"field": "tiv",
"expected": null,
"got": null,
"correct": true
}
],
"retries": 0,
"guardrails": [
{
"node": "extraction",
"guardrail": "schema",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"node": "grounding",
"guardrail": "grounding",
"status": "warn"
},
{
"node": "appetite",
"guardrail": "missing_fields",
"status": "warn"
},
{
"node": "appetite",
"guardrail": "confidence",
"status": "trip"
}
],
"flags": [
{
"field": "propertyAddress",
"issue": "ambiguous",
"detail": "address has no resolvable state or county — cannot place the risk"
},
{
"field": "units",
"issue": "contradiction",
"detail": "Email says 12 units, while the attachment rows (4+4) and its note say 8 units across 2 locations; the sources conflict."
},
{
"field": "yearBuilt",
"issue": "contradiction",
"detail": "Insured says around 2005 per the email, while the county record and schedule say 1988; the extracted value matches the county record but the sources conflict."
},
{
"field": "subclass",
"issue": "ambiguous",
"detail": "not clearly supported by source: Sources describe duplex-style rentals; 'Duplex/fourplex schedule' is an inference, though the schedule's 4-unit locations loosely suggest fourplexes."
},
{
"field": "state",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "state is required by the appetite ruleset"
},
{
"field": "tiv",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "TIV (total insured value) is required by the appetite ruleset"
}
]
}v2-repeat
- result
- ok
- prompt tokens
- 4,927
- output tokens
- 1,869
- cost
- $0.0309
- latency
- 51,518 ms · 3 calls
- at
- 2026-10-19 22:10
- stages
- intake extraction grounding appetite
- decision
- REFERRED
- fitScore
- 42
- retries
- 0
- fieldsWrong
- 0
| check | verdict |
|---|
| extraction_schema | pass |
| fields_correct | pass |
| construction_canonical | not applicable |
| nulls_stay_null | pass |
| decision_correct | pass |
| attribution_jev | pass |
| attribution_claude | fail |
{
"decision": "REFERRED",
"expectedDecision": "REFERRED",
"decisionCorrect": true,
"fitScore": 42,
"confidence": 0.607,
"reasons": [
"email states 12 units, attachment schedule totals 8",
"aggregate confidence 61% below 70% threshold",
"missing required fields: state, TIV (total insured value)"
],
"extraction": {
"insuredName": {
"value": "Seabreeze Duplexes LLC",
"confidence": 0.95,
"source": "email"
},
"propertyAddress": {
"value": "118 Ocean View Dr; 122 Ocean View Dr",
"confidence": 0.8,
"source": "both"
},
"state": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"county": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"units": {
"value": 12,
"confidence": 0.35,
"source": "email"
},
"tiv": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"constructionType": {
"value": "Frame",
"confidence": 0.95,
"source": "both"
},
"yearBuilt": {
"value": 1988,
"confidence": 0.55,
"source": "both"
},
"targetPremium": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"subclass": {
"value": "Duplex/fourplex schedule",
"confidence": 0.85,
"source": "both"
},
"priorLossSummary": {
"value": "Insured states losses were minor cosmetic damage only (unverified); prior carrier non-renewed after storm season.",
"confidence": 0.4,
"source": "email"
}
},
"extracted": [
{
"field": "insuredName",
"value": "Seabreeze Duplexes LLC",
"source": "email"
},
{
"field": "propertyAddress",
"value": "118 Ocean View Dr; 122 Ocean View Dr",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "units",
"value": 12,
"source": "email"
},
{
"field": "constructionType",
"value": "Frame",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "yearBuilt",
"value": 1988,
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "subclass",
"value": "Duplex/fourplex schedule",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "priorLossSummary",
"value": "Insured states losses were minor cosmetic damage only (unverified); prior carrier non-renewed after storm season.",
"source": "email"
}
],
"fields": [
{
"field": "state",
"expected": null,
"got": null,
"correct": true
},
{
"field": "tiv",
"expected": null,
"got": null,
"correct": true
}
],
"retries": 0,
"guardrails": [
{
"node": "extraction",
"guardrail": "schema",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"node": "grounding",
"guardrail": "grounding",
"status": "trip"
},
{
"node": "appetite",
"guardrail": "missing_fields",
"status": "warn"
},
{
"node": "appetite",
"guardrail": "confidence",
"status": "trip"
}
],
"flags": [
{
"field": "units",
"issue": "contradiction",
"detail": "email states 12 units, attachment schedule totals 8"
},
{
"field": "propertyAddress",
"issue": "ambiguous",
"detail": "address has no resolvable state or county — cannot place the risk"
},
{
"field": "units",
"issue": "contradiction",
"detail": "Broker email says 12 units, but the attachment's rows sum to 8 and its note says 8 units total across 2 locations."
},
{
"field": "subclass",
"issue": "ambiguous",
"detail": "not clearly supported by source: No source uses a 'Duplex/fourplex schedule' classification. The email says duplex-style rentals, and the schedule shows 4-unit locations, so the label is inferred."
},
{
"field": "state",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "state is required by the appetite ruleset"
},
{
"field": "tiv",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "TIV (total insured value) is required by the appetite ruleset"
}
]
}v3
- result
- ok
- prompt tokens
- 5,187
- output tokens
- 1,702
- cost
- $0.0312
- latency
- 55,004 ms · 3 calls
- at
- 2026-10-19 22:10
- stages
- intake extraction grounding appetite
- decision
- REFERRED
- fitScore
- 32
- retries
- 0
- fieldsWrong
- 0
| check | verdict |
|---|
| extraction_schema | pass |
| fields_correct | pass |
| construction_canonical | not applicable |
| nulls_stay_null | pass |
| decision_correct | pass |
| attribution_jev | pass |
| attribution_claude | fail |
{
"decision": "REFERRED",
"expectedDecision": "REFERRED",
"decisionCorrect": true,
"fitScore": 32,
"confidence": 0.645,
"reasons": [
"aggregate confidence 65% below 70% threshold",
"missing required fields: state, unit count, TIV (total insured value)"
],
"extraction": {
"insuredName": {
"value": "Seabreeze Duplexes LLC",
"confidence": 0.97,
"source": "email"
},
"propertyAddress": {
"value": "118 Ocean View Dr; 122 Ocean View Dr",
"confidence": 0.8,
"source": "both"
},
"state": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"county": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"units": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"tiv": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"constructionType": {
"value": "Frame",
"confidence": 0.95,
"source": "both"
},
"yearBuilt": {
"value": 1988,
"confidence": 0.6,
"source": "both"
},
"targetPremium": {
"value": null,
"confidence": 0,
"source": null
},
"subclass": {
"value": "Duplex/fourplex schedule",
"confidence": 0.7,
"source": "email"
},
"priorLossSummary": {
"value": "Insured states losses were minor cosmetic damage only (unverified). Prior carrier non-renewed after storm season.",
"confidence": 0.6,
"source": "email"
}
},
"extracted": [
{
"field": "insuredName",
"value": "Seabreeze Duplexes LLC",
"source": "email"
},
{
"field": "propertyAddress",
"value": "118 Ocean View Dr; 122 Ocean View Dr",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "constructionType",
"value": "Frame",
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "yearBuilt",
"value": 1988,
"source": "both"
},
{
"field": "subclass",
"value": "Duplex/fourplex schedule",
"source": "email"
},
{
"field": "priorLossSummary",
"value": "Insured states losses were minor cosmetic damage only (unverified). Prior carrier non-renewed after storm season.",
"source": "email"
}
],
"fields": [
{
"field": "state",
"expected": null,
"got": null,
"correct": true
},
{
"field": "tiv",
"expected": null,
"got": null,
"correct": true
}
],
"retries": 0,
"guardrails": [
{
"node": "extraction",
"guardrail": "schema",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"node": "grounding",
"guardrail": "grounding",
"status": "warn"
},
{
"node": "appetite",
"guardrail": "missing_fields",
"status": "warn"
},
{
"node": "appetite",
"guardrail": "confidence",
"status": "trip"
}
],
"flags": [
{
"field": "propertyAddress",
"issue": "ambiguous",
"detail": "address has no resolvable state or county — cannot place the risk"
},
{
"field": "yearBuilt",
"issue": "contradiction",
"detail": "Insured says around 2005 per the email, while the county record and the schedule say 1988; the extraction took 1988 without flagging the conflict."
},
{
"field": "state",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "state is required by the appetite ruleset"
},
{
"field": "units",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "unit count is required by the appetite ruleset"
},
{
"field": "tiv",
"issue": "missing",
"detail": "TIV (total insured value) is required by the appetite ruleset"
}
]
}